tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post2402139605653740485..comments2023-12-23T18:42:30.780+05:30Comments on Practical Academic: Bombay High Court's View on Retrospective Operation of the MSMED Act, 2006 Badrinath Srinivasanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11123853000962107353noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post-41248282819681858942015-12-26T12:38:54.906+05:302015-12-26T12:38:54.906+05:30I want to know whether a party which has obtained ...I want to know whether a party which has obtained UAN online can seek arbitration by the Council for a dispute which occurred prior to the date of obtaining the Udyog Aadhaar Memorandum. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06129020303574207845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post-34983002501175171772014-07-25T16:04:02.387+05:302014-07-25T16:04:02.387+05:30below inquiry in to facts may ADD TO THOUGHT PROCE...below inquiry in to facts may ADD TO THOUGHT PROCESS<br /><br />1) Are the parties SSI before they filed EM -Part II?<br /><br />2) Do they hold permanent SSI certificate issued by DIC at time of supply? <br /><br />3) What is the statutory bar or prohibition for not becoming or not filing EM part -II now??<br /><br />4) The lis / dispute being saved under law of limitation what is wrong in going before IFC?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10384601875092441144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post-59577820689753526032014-01-26T12:03:10.943+05:302014-01-26T12:03:10.943+05:30Any idea whether this decision has been challenged...Any idea whether this decision has been challenged in a higher forum .... It has practical implications for several SSI units as bulk of the cases now coming up before MSEFC were originally filed before IFC .... pls advise if there is some clarity in the repeal/savings clause u/s 32 of MSMED Act,2006rajeshnoreply@blogger.com