tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post4998393722665422065..comments2023-12-23T18:42:30.780+05:30Comments on Practical Academic: Is this the End of N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers? Swiss Timing v Organising CommitteeBadrinath Srinivasanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11123853000962107353noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post-47227987687099312932014-06-14T16:15:26.805+05:302014-06-14T16:15:26.805+05:30I agree with Geoffrey that the arbitrator has no a...I agree with Geoffrey that the arbitrator has no ability to deal with the public issue of guilt. Disputes relating to rights in rem are required to be adjudicated by courts and public tribunals, being unsuited for private arbitration. No one brought Booz Allen to the Hon’ble Courts notice.Samironnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6685096796297650696.post-92145583895521639122014-05-31T20:36:23.876+05:302014-05-31T20:36:23.876+05:30Logically, an arbitral panel may determine private...Logically, an arbitral panel may determine private issues such as whether D's fraudulent conduct has cause loss by C, deciding that D recompense C.<br />That said, the panel has no ability to deal with the public issue of guilt. That is in the purview of the Court.Geoffreyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17173641000508998049noreply@blogger.com