"I realise that some of my criticisms may be mistaken; but to refuse to criticize judgements for fear of being mistaken is to abandon criticism altogether... If any of my criticisms are found to be correct, the cause is served; and if any are found to be incorrect the very process of finding out my mistakes must lead to the discovery of the right reasons, or better reasons than I have been able to give, and the cause is served just as well."

-Mr. HM Seervai, Preface to the 1st ed., Constitutional Law of India.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Judgements

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. M/s National Organic Chemical Industries Limited CIVIL APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2003 decided on November 6, 2008 by Dalveer Bhandari & HS Bedi JJ.
The question before the Court was whether ethylene and propylene manufactured by the M/s National Organic Chemical Industries Limited and used in its factory in the further manufacture of the same goods would be entitled to the benefit of exemption from excise duty contained in notification no.217/86. Th Court answered the question in the affirmative.
(judgement available at www.judis.nic.in)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Terrorism and Insurance (Assurance)

Supreme Court of India
(CIVIL APPEAL NO.7515 OF 2001)

M/s KRISHNA FOOD & BAKING
INDUSTRY P. LTD. ... Appellants

Versus

M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.
LTD. & ANR. ... Respondents

http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx